<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uba Kontrovasie &#187; Paid Search (SEM)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/category/sem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com</link>
	<description>Curious, fascinated and intelligently wasting time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:27:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Morality</title>
		<link>http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/morality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/morality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dhiren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paid Search (SEM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics & Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 

I love reading Wired, every month the magazine is a good mix of technology, politics, science and other things from the town of Geeksville. 
I never really log-on to their website purely because I read so many blogs and tech websites, picking up an actual paper pub and flicking through it over a coffee makes a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/google_morality.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-363" title="google_morality" src="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/google_morality.png" alt="" width="540" height="322" /></a></p>
<p><span>I love reading Wired, every month the magazine is a good mix of technology, politics, science and other things from the town of Geeksville. </span></p>
<p>I never really log-on to their website purely because I read so many blogs and tech websites, picking up an actual paper pub and flicking through it over a coffee makes a nice treat. </p>
<p>Anyway I digress&#8230;</p>
<p>In this months issue there was quite a good piece on Google, their recent acts of immorality and the organisation changing it’s stance on their original promise of “not doing evil”. </p>
<p>Wired as we all know is a US magazine and all the examples given in the piece were based on Google’s immoral doings in its homeland. </p>
<p>Personally I think the acts of immorality have not been exclusive to the US. Google’s recent move to allow gambling advertisers to use paid search advertising in the UK is quite frankly, the icing on their immoral cake. </p>
<p>They have clearly opened up their advertising platform to gambling advertisers in order to sustain financial business growth throughout the credit crunch. </p>
<p>With a currently unstable economic climate, people are being encouraged to be wise with their cash. This means living within our means, avoiding credit use, overdrafts etc. </p>
<p>Taking all of the above into account, what does Google do? They help gambling companies push gambling (a significant waste of money and cause for bad debt) onto the public for the sake of sustaining their own profitability and growth.</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230;I’ll leave you guys to be judge of their actions, in the meantime enjoy the pic I’ve scanned from this months Wired.<br />
<h3>Similar ramblings:</h3>
<ul class="related_post">
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/google-incorporates-collaborative-filtering-ish-features-into-search-options/" title="Google incorporates collaborative filtering-ish features into search options">Google incorporates collaborative filtering-ish features into search options (0)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/some-music-trends/" title="Some music trends">Some music trends (0)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/people-powered-search-vs-algorithm-powered-search/" title="People powered search vs. Algorithm powered search">People powered search vs. Algorithm powered search (1)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/onebox-many-results/" title="Onebox &#8211; many results">Onebox &#8211; many results (0)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/nru/" title="NRU">NRU (0)</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/morality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google first click free</title>
		<link>http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/google-first-click-free/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/google-first-click-free/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 11:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dhiren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Natural Search Optimisation (NSO)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search (SEM)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising/subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine bots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic driving]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is great news for publishers who rely on advertising/subscription driven business models as having “first click free” traffic will ensure consistent revenue is generated from new content and strategic placement of calls to sale at the end of article excerpts will help to drive paid subscriptions...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently people began to question Googles views on cloaking despite their clear <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=35769">guidelines</a> as the New York Times had content ranking on Google news, which when users clicked through required a subscription. This is essentially cloaking via IP delivery and serving search engine bots a different version of content from what the public sees.</p>
<p>NYT was essentially a “walled garden”, however it appeared to be open in the eyes of the search engines, many people suspected unofficial  agreements being made between Google and the NYT.</p>
<p>This may have been true at the time but since then Google launched <a href="http://googlenewsblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/first-click-free.html">first click free</a> a service which allows providers of premium news content to have their content indexed and ranked within Google News whilst only providing excerpts of the full articles to surfers, requesting for a subscription fee to continue reading.</p>
<p>This is great news for publishers who rely on advertising/subscription driven business models as having “first click free” traffic will ensure consistent revenue is generated from new content and strategic placement of calls to sale at the end of article excerpts will help to drive paid subscriptions.</p>
<p>Another reason why this is a win for publishers is that publishers have been known to use paid search advertising to drive traffic and increase page impressions and ad impressions through targeting the search “long tail” and buying as much inventory on low CPC’s as possible. As Google tighten their paid search guidelines through the quality score system it will become harder for affiliates and publishers to make revenues via arbitraging traffic.</p>
<p>“First click free” will hopefully counteract the growing stringencies of paid search advertising for publishers at least.<br />
<h3>Similar ramblings:</h3>
<ul class="related_post">
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/google-indexing-flash-what-will-this-mean-for-accessibility/" title="Google indexing flash, what will this mean for accessibility?">Google indexing flash, what will this mean for accessibility? (0)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/act-like-you-deserve-your-top-spot-in-google/" title="Act like you deserve your top spot in Google!">Act like you deserve your top spot in Google! (0)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/marking-up-websites-for-the-semantic-web/" title="Marking up websites for The Semantic Web">Marking up websites for The Semantic Web (1)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/google-trends-for-websites/" title="Google Trends for Websites">Google Trends for Websites (0)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/what-the-acquisition-of-metaweb-will-mean-for-google/" title="What the acquisition of Metaweb will mean for Google ">What the acquisition of Metaweb will mean for Google  (0)</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uba-kontrovasie.com/google-first-click-free/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
